Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Steven Aschheim

Print publication date: 2001

Print ISBN-13: 9780520220560

Published to California Scholarship Online: May 2012

DOI: 10.1525/california/9780520220560.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CALIFORNIA SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.california.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of California Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CALSO for personal use (for details see www.california.universitypressscholarship.com/page/535/privacy-policy-and-legal-notice).date: 19 March 2019

Between Justice and Politics

Between Justice and Politics

The Competition of Storytellers in the Eichmann Trial

Chapter:
(p.232) Between Justice and Politics
Source:
Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem
Author(s):

Leora Bilsky

Publisher:
University of California Press
DOI:10.1525/california/9780520220560.003.0016

The case of the state of Israel against Adolf Eichmann was brought to trial in Jerusalem in 1961 and was concluded with the judgment of the court. The judgment was pronounced unanimously — the court spoke with one voice, providing the official (hi)story. Gideon Hausner, the attorney general in Eichmann's trial, took it upon himself to be the master storyteller. He claimed to speak with the voice of six million victims, six million accusers. Hannah Arendt, who came as a reporter for the New Yorker, was also a storyteller of the Eichmann trial. However, Arendt was not an official actor in the legal drama, and she deliberately took it upon herself to provide a counternarrative, the story that was not told but should have been told in the courtroom. This chapter focuses on two aspects of their respective stories. One might be called the “framework” of the narrative, its temporal and spatial boundaries. With respect to temporal boundaries, Hausner's story stretches to include the whole of Jewish history, while Arendt begins her story in the nineteenth century. With respect to spatial boundaries, Hausner's story focuses on the Jewish people, while Arendt's concern is humanity. The second way in which their narratives are compared concerns the question of who is to tell the story — that is, whether the story will be told through written documents or through the oral testimonies of survivors.

Keywords:   Israel, Adolf Eichmann, Hannah Arendt, Gideon Hausner, Jewish history, narrative, story

California Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.