Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Steven Aschheim

Print publication date: 2001

Print ISBN-13: 9780520220560

Published to California Scholarship Online: May 2012

DOI: 10.1525/california/9780520220560.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CALIFORNIA SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.california.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of California Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CALSO for personal use (for details see www.california.universitypressscholarship.com/page/535/privacy-policy-and-legal-notice).date: 23 September 2018

The Grammar of Prudence

The Grammar of Prudence

Arendt, Jaspers, and the Appraisal of Max Weber

Chapter:
(p.306) The Grammar of Prudence
Source:
Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem
Author(s):

Peter Baehr

Publisher:
University of California Press
DOI:10.1525/california/9780520220560.003.0020

This chapter focuses on the exchange between Jaspers and Arendt over a problem — condensed in the name of Max Weber — that had first emerged specifically in their correspondence as early as January 1933 and that retained its salience until roughly three years before Jaspers's death in 1969. It suggests that few authors of the twentieth century offered a more comprehensive alternative to Weber's political and sociological thought than Arendt did. It begins by examining how Jaspers summoned Weber's name to delineate a certain idea of Germanness and how Arendt responded to Jaspers's attempts to encompass her within this idea. It shows that she was much more forthright in rejecting Jaspers's interpretation of Germany than she was in confronting his view of Max Weber, and this also has to be explained. The chapter then answers a couple of related hermeneutical questions. If Arendt and Weber were so markedly at variance as theorists, why did this not emerge in the Arendt–Jaspers correspondence, where Weber's name is so often invoked? And how did Hannah Arendt respond to Jaspers on the Weber question in a way that minimized conflict between her and her erstwhile supervisor? Answering this latter question illustrates some of the major axes of difference that typify Arendt's and Weber's approaches to political and sociological questions.

Keywords:   Hannah Arendt, Karl Jaspers, Max Weber, Germany, Germanness

California Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.