Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Steven Aschheim

Print publication date: 2001

Print ISBN-13: 9780520220560

Published to California Scholarship Online: May 2012

DOI: 10.1525/california/9780520220560.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CALIFORNIA SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.california.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of California Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CALSO for personal use (for details see http://california.universitypressscholarship.com/page/535/privacy-policy-and-legal-notice).date: 12 December 2017

Theodicy in Jerusalem

Theodicy in Jerusalem

Chapter:
(p.65) Theodicy in Jerusalem
Source:
Hannah Arendt in Jerusalem
Author(s):

Susan Neiman

Publisher:
University of California Press
DOI:10.1525/california/9780520220560.003.0005

This chapter offers a reading of the book, Eichmann in Jerusalem, in terms that are unavailable on its surface. It begins with a summary of the modern problem of evil in order to place the issues raised by Arendt in traditional context. It then discusses Arendt's use of theological discourse and her remarks about philosophy in order to outline the constraints her project must face: If Arendt's work provides a (substitute for) theodicy, it does so in radically modern form. Her decided antipathy to Hegelian attempts to justify Creation through history is as much rooted in Kantian metaphysics as in the experience of the Shoah and must entail rejecting any hint of suggestion that this world is the best of all possible ones. The chapter then proceeds to examine her discussion of evil as a piece of moral psychology and philosophy whose goal is to preserve individual moral responsibility without relying on a notion of intention. Finally, it discusses the ways in which that discussion serves practical and theoretical ends. It responds to concrete political dangers Arendt correctly anticipated while providing a metaphysical framework that allows us to preserve the stance she ascribed to Lessing: not entirely at home in the world, but committed to it.

Keywords:   Hannah Arendt, Kantian metaphysics, evil, theological discourse, philosophy, moral psychology

California Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.