This chapter presents some concluding thoughts. This book has shown how Tacitus analyzes a particular form of government that responded to a particular societal need. Foucault emphasizes the valorization of certain formal arrangements of speech, and the pragmatic and tangible relations of power that result from this practice. Tacitus, by contrast, recreates with the peculiarities of his narrative the perceptions of the Julio–Claudian regime that existed in people's minds. Thus, Foucault would be interested in the disciplinary effects produced by various forms of Soviet power (e.g., judicial, social, economic) that create individuals who respond to it in a particular way; whereas Tacitus would represent the individuals' perceptions of their relation to power by imitating common phrases, beliefs, rumors, political deliberations, and machinations.
California Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.