This chapter presents some concluding thoughts. It argues that Egypt's historiographical culture prescribed the writing of patriotic accounts of liberation and struggle that are extremely useful in forging identity and inducing group cohesion. Since the state and the nation are practically indistinguishable, critical accounts are treated as unpatriotic, dangerous, and ultimately illegitimate. No matter how tentatively it did so, once Egyptian culture committed itself to this mode of operation, it inevitably committed itself also to the severe implications of that mode. Four examples for such implications are discussed.
California Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.