Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Appealing to Justice$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Kitty Calavita and Valerie Jenness

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780520284173

Published to California Scholarship Online: May 2015

DOI: 10.1525/california/9780520284173.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM CALIFORNIA SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.california.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright University of California Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in CALSO for personal use.date: 23 July 2021

“Narcissists,” “Liars,” Process, and Paper

“Narcissists,” “Liars,” Process, and Paper

The Dilemmas and Solutions of Grievance Handlers

Chapter:
(p.97) Chapter 5 “Narcissists,” “Liars,” Process, and Paper
Source:
Appealing to Justice
Author(s):

Kitty Calavita

Valerie Jenness

Publisher:
University of California Press
DOI:10.1525/california/9780520284173.003.0005

This chapter traces the impact of the conflicting logics of rights and carceral control on prison staff. Almost all of these staff acknowledged that filing a grievance is a legitimate prisoner right and that the grievance system is a useful managerial tool, but they ridiculed prisoners who file grievances and trivialized their appeals. Drawing on and extending scholarship on administrative decision making, the authors argue that these officials are caught between the perceived realities of their institution and attending to its logics, while at the same time acceding to the cultural logic of rights. Impugning the character of prisoners who exercise their right to appeal is a cognitive solution to this tension. This cognitive turn has not-so-subtle racial implications, as the portrayal of the overly pampered prisoner echoes the (post) civil rights trope that people of color are entitlement-seeking beneficiaries of special privileges. Finally, the chapter examines the ways in which a focus on rules and paperwork shores up certainty in uncertain terrain and facilitates emotional distance.

Keywords:   legitimate, administrative decision making, rights, carceral logic, race, rules, paperwork

California Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.