This concluding chapter summarizes the issues discussed in the book and looks ahead to the aftermath of the incorruptibility controversy as it played out in the second half of the sixth century. Invoking what it called “the stereoscopic approach,” the book has argued that Severus of Antioch's position concerning the social body of Christ was both reflected in and informed by his position concerning the physical body of Christ. According to Severus, Jesus's body before the resurrection was corruptible and attained incorruptibility only after its death and resurrection. Julian, on the other hand, claimed that the body of Christ was incorruptible from the moment of the incarnation. Severus's eucharistic outlook, like his christology and ecclesiology, recognized both corrupt and incorrupt aspects in the liturgical body, whereas Julian viewed the Eucharist as purely incorrupt. This chapter ends by offering three examples of the ways in which Severus's followers perpetuated Julian's legacy under the former's name, and in the process transformed both the memory of Severus and the identity of the anti-Chalcedonian movement itself.
California Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.